The exploration of Mars has captivated both public imagination and scientific inquiry, fueled by the question of whether life exists beyond Earth. As humans have looked towards the stars, Mars, with its proximity and intriguing characteristics, has emerged as a focal point for research. The red planet's similar day length to Earth and evidence of past liquid water makes it a prime candidate for studying habitability. This interest has sparked debates among scientists, policymakers, and the public about the potential for life on Mars and the feasibility of human colonization.
The debates have caused diverse viewpoints surrounding
the study of Mars' habitability. Some scientists argue that the search for life
on Mars could revolutionize our understanding of biology, suggesting that life
might be common throughout the universe. Others emphasize Mars as a natural
laboratory for understanding planetary processes, such as climate change and
volcanic activity, which have direct implications for Earth. Lastly, many
scientists have looked at Mars as the primary candidate for a non-Earth human
colony. These debates cause growing controversy within the scientific
community, however there is one thing we must agree on. With growing Earth
populations and over-arching problems like global warming, nuclear war, and natural
disasters, it is important to the future of humans that we establish a Martian
colony and become a multi-planetary species.
Water
Many would say that the main ingredient for life is
water, and there’s strong evidence that Mars once had liquid water and a strong
magnetic field. It seems that when Mars lost its magnetic field, solar winds
eroded the atmosphere, causing the liquid water to dry up [7]. Geological
evidence suggests that before the loss of its magnetic field, Mars had a
thicker atmosphere and warmer climate, making it possible for liquid water,
maybe even oceans, to exist [2].
Although there isn’t any visible water on the
surface of Mars, planetary scientists have found water beneath the surface [1].
As seen in Figure 1, scientists started to search for water and ice underneath
the surface of mars because of surface patterns. The scalloped and jagged
textures prompted researchers to look in certain regions, but sub-surface water
is much more prevalent than was previously thought. For instance, we’ve found
massive underground ice deposits in places like Utopia Planitia, with
volumes comparable to Earth's
Lake Superior [3], [4], [5]. As shown in Figure 2, scientists estimate up
to 40% of Martian soil contains water and ice in certain regions. [1]. And in 2018, scientists discovered a
subglacial lake beneath the southern polar ice cap, showing there are stable
water bodies in extreme Martian environments [6]. These discoveries are super
exciting because it means that future human explorers could potentially use
these water resources, making Mars livable. The water could not only be used
for the humans permanently living on Mars, but also for humans on Earth. With
the growing population of humans on Earth, Mars’ water could prove useful in
the next hundred years, even. Scientists project that unless humans change
their water usage, there could be a massive global shortage of water by 2040 [16].
With this being said, Mars colonization could be more important than we
thought.
Figure 1: Scalloped regions on
Martian surface prompt scientists to search for ice [4],[5]
Figure 2: Robinson projection of
water presence in Martian soil [1]
Other Life Elements
There have been other
findings that support the idea of past or future life on Mars. For instance, NASA’s
Curiosity rover
has identified key chemical ingredients for life in the Martian soil, including
sulfur, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and possibly carbon [15]. These
elements are essential for life as we know it.
Curiosity’s findings are crucial not only for
understanding Mars' history but also for future human colonization. The
presence of these life-supporting elements means that Mars has some of the
basic building blocks needed to sustain life. This knowledge can help us
develop strategies for creating a self-sustaining colony. For example, knowing
where to find essential elements can guide us in selecting sites for human
habitats. Additionally, these elements could be used to grow food, produce
oxygen, and support other life-support systems. The discovery of these
chemicals, combined with the presence of water, makes Mars one of the most
promising locations for future human settlement in our solar system.
Controversy
The main counter argument posed is that the water
on Mars could be difficult to reach. Although the water is located below the
surface, it is likely that Martian colonies will have to be built beneath the
surface as well. Thus, both problems will be solved with the same technology.
It is important to realize that finding water on a planetary body at all is
more than half of the battle.
The same problems arise with building the actual
colonies. As said before, Mars lacks a current magnetic field, but it also has
a very thin atmosphere. Any water on the surface would be immediately sublimated
into water vapor [5]. Since Mars doesn’t have much of an atmosphere and has no
magnetic field, the planet is exposed to intense radiation every day. Martian
soil also has an abundance of perchlorates, a toxic substance which affects
human hormones [8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]. These factors would make
living on the surface nearly impossible. Thus, living below ground would be the
best option. Underground, pressurized labs could be built comparable to the
inside of an airplane, where humans would acclimate to living over time. There,
humans would be safe from cosmic radiation, the freezing surface temperatures, and
Martian soil. The construction of these labs could be critical, as they would
serve as research centers and could help extract Mars’ resources to send them
back to Earth where they are needed.
With the abundance of water, life elements, and overall
similarities to Earth, Mars is the perfect candidate for a human settlement and
resource mining. As tensions between world superpowers grow every day, holding
a Martian colony could be valuable if humans on Earth were to self-implode. Not
only could humans cause their own demise on Earth, but natural disasters could
as well. Volcanic calderas such as the Yellowstone Super
Caldera could erupt any day causing thick layers of ash and famine across
the planet [17]. Asteroids similar in size to the one that theoretically caused
the dinosaurs to go extinct could inevitably hit Earth and cause an extinction
as well. All in all, a Martian colony could provide a safety net for humans if
something bad happened to Earth, and it could provide necessary resources for
all humans during a time of need.
Conclusion
Wrapping things up, it’s clear that Mars is an
incredibly promising candidate for future colonization. The discovery of
essential life-supporting elements like sulfur, nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen,
phosphorus, and possibly carbon, along with past evidence of liquid water,
suggests that Mars might have been more Earth-like than we ever imagined. These
findings from NASA’s Curiosity rover and other missions show that Mars has the
potential to reveal secrets about past life and support future human habitation.
Mars’ Earth-like day length and underground ice deposits are valuable resources
that we could use to build a sustainable colony.
Embracing the idea of colonizing Mars has some
pretty exciting implications for our future. By investing in Mars exploration,
we’re not only expanding the human population but also developing technologies
and gaining resources that can benefit life on Earth. Plus, establishing a
human presence on Mars would be a huge step toward ensuring the long-term
survival of our species, providing a potential refuge in the face of global
challenges such as global warming, scarce resources, nuclear war, and natural
disasters. So, whether you’re a curious reader or a policymaker, supporting
Mars exploration is a smart move that promises great rewards for humanity’s
future.
Bibliography
[1] Feldman, W. C., et al. “Global
Distribution of Near‐surface Hydrogen on Mars.” Journal of Geophysical
Research: Planets, vol. 109, no. E9, Sept. 2004, p. 2003JE002160, doi: 10.1029/2003JE002160
[2] V. R.
Baker, R. G. Strom, V. C. Gulick, J. S. Kargel, G. Komatsu, and V. S. Kale,
“Ancient oceans, ice sheets and the hydrological cycle on Mars,” Nature,
vol. 352, no. 6336, pp. 589–594, Aug. 1991, doi: 10.1038/352589a0.
[3] NASA, “Catalog Page for
PIA21136.” Available: https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA21136
[4] NASA, “Lake of frozen water the
size of New Mexico found on Mars – NASA.” Available: https://www.theregister.com/2016/11/22/nasa_finds_ice_under_martian_surface/
[5] NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), “Mars
Ice Deposit Holds as Much Water as Lake Superior,” Available: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/mars-ice-deposit-holds-as-much-water-as-lake-superior
[6] R.
Orosei et al., “Radar evidence of subglacial liquid water on Mars,” Science,
vol. 361, no. 6401, pp. 490–493, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aar7268.
[7] V.
Dehant et al., “Planetary magnetic dynamo effect on atmospheric
protection of early Earth and Mars,” in Geology and Habitability of
Terrestrial Planets, K. E. Fishbaugh, P. Lognonné, F. Raulin, D. J. Des
Marais, and O. Korablev, Eds., New York, NY: Springer, 2007, pp. 279–300. doi:
10.1007/978-0-387-74288-5_10.
[8] J. Wadsworth
and C. S. Cockell, “Perchlorates on Mars enhance the bacteriocidal effects of
UV light,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 4662, Jul. 2017, doi:
10.1038/s41598-017-04910-3.
[9] G.
Ertem, M. C. Ertem, C. P. McKay, and R. M. Hazen, “Shielding biomolecules from
effects of radiation by Mars analogue minerals and soils,” Int. J.
Astrobiol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 280–285, Jul. 2017, doi:
10.1017/S1473550416000331.
[10] T.
Matsubara, K. Fujishima, C. W. Saltikov, S. Nakamura, and L. J. Rothschild,
“Earth analogues for past and future life on Mars: isolation of perchlorate
resistant halophiles from Big Soda Lake,” Int. J. Astrobiol., vol. 16,
no. 3, pp. 218–228, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1017/S1473550416000458.
[11] J.
Heinz, T. Krahn, and D. Schulze-Makuch, “A new record for microbial perchlorate
tolerance: fungal growth in NaClO4 brines and its implications for putative
life on Mars,” Life, vol. 10, no. 5, Art. no. 5, May 2020, doi:
10.3390/life10050053.
[12] J.
Heinz et al., “Perchlorate-specific proteomic stress responses of
debaryomyces hansenii could enable microbial survival in Martian brines,” Environ.
Microbiol., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 5051–5065, 2022, doi:
10.1111/1462-2920.16152.
[13] A. F.
A. Soudi, O. Farhat, F. Chen, B. C. Clark, and M. A. Schneegurt, “Bacterial
growth tolerance to concentrations of chlorate and perchlorate salts relevant
to Mars,” Int. J. Astrobiol., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 229–235, Jul. 2017,
doi: 10.1017/S1473550416000434.
[14] J.
Heinz, A. C. Waajen, A. Airo, A. Alibrandi, J. Schirmack, and D.
Schulze-Makuch, “Bacterial growth in chloride and perchlorate brines:
halotolerances and salt stress responses of planococcus halocryophilus,” Astrobiology,
vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1377–1387, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1089/ast.2019.2069.
[15] J. L.
Eigenbrode et al., “Organic matter preserved in 3-billion-year-old
mudstones at Gale crater, Mars,” Science, vol. 360, no. 6393, pp.
1096–1101, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aas9185.
[16] T.
W. Counts, “When will the world run out of water?” Accessed: Jul. 04, 2024.
[Online]. Available:
https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/planet-earth/state-of-the-planet/when-will-the-world-run-out-of-water
[17] “What Would a Yellowstone Eruption Mean for
North America?,” HowStuffWorks. Accessed: Jul. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/what-if/what-if-yellowstone-supervolcano-erupted.htm
Hey Matthew! I think you did a great job with this blog post. It wasn't too technical, but I was still able to understand the science behind it. I also like how you explained all of the benefits of a colonization on Mars while also acknowledging the fact that there are controversies regarding the topic. I think the conclusion provided a nice summary while you also took a stance on the issue. I also liked your section on water on Mars, I did a similar topic for my press translation. Overall, good work!
ReplyDelete- Madeline